Official rating indexUS 3V3 leaderboard Every player published on Blizzard's current PvP season ladder, ranked from the official source.
Ranked players 117
Updated Sep 19, 4:00 AM UTC
Source Blizzard live ✦ All D Death Knight D Demon Hunter D Druid E Evoker H Hunter M Mage M Monk P Paladin P Priest R Rogue S Shaman W Warlock W Warrior Rank Player Rating Record Win rate
#1920 P Tpokesqt malganis · Preservation Evoker 1,801 Rival I 35–28 63 played 56% Official season View › #2003 P Filistini area-52 · Preservation Evoker 1,794 Challenger II 54–65 119 played 45% Official season View › #2018 P Elidrackthry nemesis · Preservation Evoker 1,793 Challenger II 41–47 88 played 47% Official season View › #2040 P Leilon illidan · Preservation Evoker 1,791 Challenger II 43–21 64 played 67% Official season View › #2100 P Speedtesthk tichondrius · Preservation Evoker 1,786 Challenger II 37–27 64 played 58% Official season View › #2147 P Shoestrings tichondrius · Preservation Evoker 1,782 Challenger II 35–20 55 played 64% Official season View › #2194 P Borzoy illidan · Preservation Evoker 1,778 Challenger II 41–20 61 played 67% Official season View › #2194 P Crimthyr tichondrius · Preservation Evoker 1,778 Challenger II 38–29 67 played 57% Official season View › #2218 P Fïññ area-52 · Preservation Evoker 1,776 Challenger II 40–27 67 played 60% Official season View › #2227 P Johnqadams tichondrius · Preservation Evoker 1,775 Challenger II 31–25 56 played 55% Official season View › #2262 P Romancer llane · Preservation Evoker 1,772 Challenger II 51–24 75 played 68% Official season View › #2325 P Neekolas lightbringer · Preservation Evoker 1,767 Challenger II 66–45 111 played 59% Official season View › #2325 P Majikärp area-52 · Preservation Evoker 1,767 Challenger II 29–19 48 played 60% Official season View › #2344 P Plils sargeras · Preservation Evoker 1,766 Challenger II 34–19 53 played 64% Official season View › #2382 P Tequilasam moon-guard · Preservation Evoker 1,763 Challenger II 43–39 82 played 52% Official season View › #2426 P Prøtect tichondrius · Preservation Evoker 1,759 Challenger II 32–18 50 played 64% Official season View › #2461 P Naapzz frostmourne · Preservation Evoker 1,756 Challenger II 40–31 71 played 56% Official season View › #2461 P Ifly archimonde · Preservation Evoker 1,756 Challenger II 28–18 46 played 61% Official season View › #2508 P Testaddment area-52 · Preservation Evoker 1,752 Challenger II 72–61 133 played 54% Official season View › #2687 P Drcornman illidan · Preservation Evoker 1,739 Challenger II 59–49 108 played 55% Official season View › #2687 P Sarahtonein tichondrius · Preservation Evoker 1,739 Challenger II 41–15 56 played 73% Official season View › #2725 P Vaporx illidan · Preservation Evoker 1,737 Challenger II 44–39 83 played 53% Official season View › #2725 P Loldragon malganis · Preservation Evoker 1,737 Challenger II 31–17 48 played 65% Official season View › #2819 P Bøa moon-guard · Preservation Evoker 1,730 Challenger II 26–13 39 played 67% Official season View › #2867 P Nathenoth bleeding-hollow · Preservation Evoker 1,727 Challenger II 45–50 95 played 47% Official season View › #2878 P Midnitevoker perenolde · Preservation Evoker 1,726 Challenger II 45–42 87 played 52% Official season View › #2959 P Dunkerx tichondrius · Preservation Evoker 1,721 Challenger II 74–59 133 played 56% Official season View › #2970 P Candyrs area-52 · Preservation Evoker 1,720 Challenger II 45–49 94 played 48% Official season View › #2988 P Danxy illidan · Preservation Evoker 1,719 Challenger II 31–18 49 played 63% Official season View › #2988 P Exrtj sargeras · Preservation Evoker 1,719 Challenger II 25–14 39 played 64% Official season View › #3008 P Groundful illidan · Preservation Evoker 1,718 Challenger II 44–39 83 played 53% Official season View › #3047 P Cheerupbebii tichondrius · Preservation Evoker 1,716 Challenger II 35–29 64 played 55% Official season View › #3119 P Timstroker tichondrius · Preservation Evoker 1,710 Challenger II 25–18 43 played 58% Official season View › #3255 P Bingbong malygos · Preservation Evoker 1,702 Challenger II 31–25 56 played 55% Official season View › #3255 P Lowkeyôp tichondrius · Preservation Evoker 1,702 Challenger II 25–8 33 played 76% Official season View › #3287 P Ihealvoo burning-legion · Preservation Evoker 1,700 Challenger II 52–38 90 played 58% Official season View › #3427 P Chronowarden burning-legion · Preservation Evoker 1,691 Challenger II 26–18 44 played 59% Official season View › #3460 P Cykløp azralon · Preservation Evoker 1,689 Challenger II 54–55 109 played 50% Official season View › #3583 P Dannyx illidan · Preservation Evoker 1,682 Challenger II 32–29 61 played 52% Official season View › #3600 P Samstupidiot illidan · Preservation Evoker 1,681 Challenger II 24–9 33 played 73% Official season View › #3630 P Dragontrees illidan · Preservation Evoker 1,679 Challenger II 28–33 61 played 46% Official season View › #3630 P Ceobigblu bonechewer · Preservation Evoker 1,679 Challenger II 23–16 39 played 59% Official season View › #3669 P Pellyd sargeras · Preservation Evoker 1,677 Challenger II 24–16 40 played 60% Official season View › #3739 P Fcheekz bleeding-hollow · Preservation Evoker 1,673 Challenger II 41–30 71 played 58% Official season View › #3751 P Dragyin tichondrius · Preservation Evoker 1,672 Challenger II 43–51 94 played 46% Official season View › #3768 P Jakedrake stormrage · Preservation Evoker 1,671 Challenger II 24–12 36 played 67% Official season View › #3810 P Timelizard frostmourne · Preservation Evoker 1,669 Challenger II 30–25 55 played 55% Official season View › #3831 P Yamabruh malganis · Preservation Evoker 1,668 Challenger II 52–52 104 played 50% Official season View › #3899 P Fogell zuljin · Preservation Evoker 1,664 Challenger II 37–23 60 played 62% Official season View › #3999 P Ruevo illidan · Preservation Evoker 1,659 Challenger II 35–36 71 played 49% Official season View › Ranks are preserved from Blizzard's official bracket ladder. Uploaded matches—including uncorroborated matches—remain visible in character history and Activity, but cannot manufacture a leaderboard rating.