Official rating indexUS 3V3 leaderboard Every player published on Blizzard's current PvP season ladder, ranked from the official source.
Ranked players 159
Updated Sep 20, 4:00 AM UTC
Source Blizzard live ✦ All D Death Knight D Demon Hunter D Druid E Evoker H Hunter M Mage M Monk P Paladin P Priest R Rogue S Shaman W Warlock W Warrior Rank Player Rating Record Win rate
#2865 P Drcornman illidan · Preservation Evoker 1,739 Challenger II 59–49 108 played 55% Official season View › #2865 P Sarahtonein tichondrius · Preservation Evoker 1,739 Challenger II 41–15 56 played 73% Official season View › #2901 P Loldragon malganis · Preservation Evoker 1,737 Challenger II 31–17 48 played 65% Official season View › #2933 D Hydroponicsz bloodscalp · Devastation Evoker 1,735 Challenger II 41–29 70 played 59% Official season View › #2996 P Bøa moon-guard · Preservation Evoker 1,730 Challenger II 26–13 39 played 67% Official season View › #3055 P Midnitevoker perenolde · Preservation Evoker 1,726 Challenger II 45–42 87 played 52% Official season View › #3145 P Candyrs area-52 · Preservation Evoker 1,720 Challenger II 45–49 94 played 48% Official season View › #3145 D Garbagevoker scilla · Devastation Evoker 1,720 Challenger II 24–14 38 played 63% Official season View › #3160 P Danxy illidan · Preservation Evoker 1,719 Challenger II 31–18 49 played 63% Official season View › #3160 P Exrtj sargeras · Preservation Evoker 1,719 Challenger II 25–16 41 played 61% Official season View › #3221 A Warchiëf tichondrius · Augmentation Evoker 1,716 Challenger II 43–32 75 played 57% Official season View › #3221 P Cheerupbebii tichondrius · Preservation Evoker 1,716 Challenger II 35–29 64 played 55% Official season View › #3271 D Cyndro sargeras · Devastation Evoker 1,712 Challenger II 29–31 60 played 48% Official season View › #3298 P Timstroker tichondrius · Preservation Evoker 1,710 Challenger II 25–18 43 played 58% Official season View › #3430 P Bingbong malygos · Preservation Evoker 1,702 Challenger II 31–25 56 played 55% Official season View › #3430 P Lowkeyôp tichondrius · Preservation Evoker 1,702 Challenger II 25–8 33 played 76% Official season View › #3472 P Ihealvoo burning-legion · Preservation Evoker 1,700 Challenger II 52–38 90 played 58% Official season View › #3609 P Chronowarden burning-legion · Preservation Evoker 1,691 Challenger II 26–18 44 played 59% Official season View › #3646 P Cykløp azralon · Preservation Evoker 1,689 Challenger II 54–55 109 played 50% Official season View › #3646 P Blackdragon mugthol · Preservation Evoker 1,689 Challenger II 29–16 45 played 64% Official season View › #3646 A Scalybussy sargeras · Augmentation Evoker 1,689 Challenger II 26–17 43 played 60% Official season View › #3776 P Dannyx illidan · Preservation Evoker 1,682 Challenger II 32–29 61 played 52% Official season View › #3788 P Samstupidiot illidan · Preservation Evoker 1,681 Challenger II 24–9 33 played 73% Official season View › #3818 P Dragontrees illidan · Preservation Evoker 1,679 Challenger II 28–33 61 played 46% Official season View › #3818 P Ceobigblu bonechewer · Preservation Evoker 1,679 Challenger II 23–16 39 played 59% Official season View › #3859 P Pellyd sargeras · Preservation Evoker 1,677 Challenger II 24–16 40 played 60% Official season View › #3930 P Fcheekz bleeding-hollow · Preservation Evoker 1,673 Challenger II 41–30 71 played 58% Official season View › #3943 P Dragyin tichondrius · Preservation Evoker 1,672 Challenger II 43–51 94 played 46% Official season View › #3960 P Nikisix tichondrius · Preservation Evoker 1,671 Challenger II 36–27 63 played 57% Official season View › #3960 P Jakedrake stormrage · Preservation Evoker 1,671 Challenger II 24–12 36 played 67% Official season View › #3999 P Timelizard frostmourne · Preservation Evoker 1,669 Challenger II 30–25 55 played 55% Official season View › #4026 P Yamabruh malganis · Preservation Evoker 1,668 Challenger II 52–52 104 played 50% Official season View › #4097 P Fogell zuljin · Preservation Evoker 1,664 Challenger II 37–23 60 played 62% Official season View › #4135 D Flightjitsu illidan · Devastation Evoker 1,662 Challenger II 24–16 40 played 60% Official season View › #4178 D Fuchur illidan · Devastation Evoker 1,660 Challenger II 37–36 73 played 51% Official season View › #4178 P Daizy doomhammer · Preservation Evoker 1,660 Challenger II 31–25 56 played 55% Official season View › #4209 P Ruevo illidan · Preservation Evoker 1,659 Challenger II 35–36 71 played 49% Official season View › #4266 P Sledgey tichondrius · Preservation Evoker 1,656 Challenger II 27–24 51 played 53% Official season View › #4266 P Walfy burning-legion · Preservation Evoker 1,656 Challenger II 26–27 53 played 49% Official season View › #4266 P Infernosa ragnaros · Preservation Evoker 1,656 Challenger II 24–10 34 played 71% Official season View › #4277 D Halcyonic tichondrius · Devastation Evoker 1,655 Challenger II 29–28 57 played 51% Official season View › #4314 P Pukyy tichondrius · Preservation Evoker 1,653 Challenger II 30–23 53 played 57% Official season View › #4314 D Timstro tichondrius · Devastation Evoker 1,653 Challenger II 26–22 48 played 54% Official season View › #4314 P Resurecty lightbringer · Preservation Evoker 1,653 Challenger II 23–20 43 played 53% Official season View › #4339 P Austinder illidan · Preservation Evoker 1,652 Challenger II 23–10 33 played 70% Official season View › #4368 P Chazdrag drakthul · Preservation Evoker 1,651 Challenger II 61–45 106 played 58% Official season View › #4396 P Therehegos area-52 · Preservation Evoker 1,650 Challenger II 50–105 155 played 32% Official season View › #4434 D Flavora tichondrius · Devastation Evoker 1,648 Challenger II 31–16 47 played 66% Official season View › #4511 P Cabal burning-legion · Preservation Evoker 1,644 Challenger II 22–12 34 played 65% Official season View › #4537 D Sinde kiljaeden · Devastation Evoker 1,643 Challenger II 22–9 31 played 71% Official season View › Ranks are preserved from Blizzard's official bracket ladder. Uploaded matches—including uncorroborated matches—remain visible in character history and Activity, but cannot manufacture a leaderboard rating.